• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Hypothesis testing/Critical Region significance?!

N

n111kus

Member
Hi,

I have a question about hypothesis testing.

I understand that if the value of a test statistic is within the critical region you reject null hypothesis.

Is it correct to say that the p-value is the probability of obtaining that value?

If the probability value is 30%, is it correct to say that there is a 30% chance of obtaining that value, and you would most likely be accepting null hypothesis?

Finally, the critical region for a t14,0.025 = +/- 2.1448 and t14,0.05 = +/-1.7613, so if the test statistic value was 2, you would accept null hypothesis at 2.5%, but reject at 5% level...What is the significance of this??

Would appreciate any comments...

Thanks

Nik
 
Hi,

I have a question about hypothesis testing.

I understand that if the value of a test statistic is within the critical region you reject null hypothesis.

Is it correct to say that the p-value is the probability of obtaining that value?

If the probability value is 30%, is it correct to say that there is a 30% chance of obtaining that value, and you would most likely be accepting null hypothesis?

Finally, the critical region for a t14,0.025 = +/- 2.1448 and t14,0.05 = +/-1.7613, so if the test statistic value was 2, you would accept null hypothesis at 2.5%, but reject at 5% level...What is the significance of this??

Would appreciate any comments...

Thanks

Nik

Apologies if you sat this on Thursday last week and my reply is too late.

The p-value is equal to the P(type 1 error) = prob of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's true.

So if the p-value is 30% then if you reject the null hypothesis there's a 30% chance that you've bodged it. Which is bad. Hence we only reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is less than 5%. So there's a 95% chance we didn't reject it when it's correct.

I'm assuming that it is a one-sided test (otherwise the p-value is double these probabilities) in which case you would say the p-value is between 2.5% and 5%. This means we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% but we can't quite reject it at the 2.5% value. (It would be unusually to test it at the 2.5% level - however you would be correct in saying we wouldn't reject it at the 2.5% level).
 
Back
Top