• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

GLIM practical query

E

entact

Member
In working on a technical analysis (GLIM) at the moment and I have a couple of questions...

I've created frequency/severity models for TPI/TPD etc. using all potential rating factors. I will be presenting the results to underwriting and then requesting feedback based on whether each significant factor can be implemented, any restrictions on rating (e.g. max loads/discounts etc.)

In order to get the necessary feedback I need to proceed I presumably need to create a combined model and present the results of that to the underwriters? Since I will be changing all the models once I know which factors are not implementable, do I need to bother with adjustments like

profit margin
expenses
reinsurance loading
etc.

at this stage or can this wait until I am coming up with the technical rates (rates with implementable factors)?

Say the underwriters feedback is that 6 factors are not implementable. Do I need to adjust all of my individual freq/sev models and re-model all of the factors or is that overkill.

I presume an impact analysis, testing model prediction via an out-of-sample is done after this stage

Many thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top