B
Binky777
Member
Hi all
Have I made a complete hash of this or is there a mistake in the FRS102 example in chapter 22 (pages 28-30)?
When switching the deferred liabilities from SFO to FRS basis, the solutions imply that deferred revaluation is switching from 3.0% pa to 2.0% pa and therefore, as the pre-retirement discount rate has also fallen by 1.0% pa, the deferred pre-retirement net rate hasn't changed.
However, when setting out the bases on page 29, pension increases in deferment were set to be 2.0% pa on both the SFO and FRS basis. The SFO basis does have inflation = 3.0% pa but unless I've completely missed something I don't think this is what should be used in the deferred basis switch?
Assuming I'm right I can follow the rest of the example through with my deferred liabilities - just wanted to make sure I hadn't missed anything/the mistake is picked up for next year!
Thanks
Bekah
Have I made a complete hash of this or is there a mistake in the FRS102 example in chapter 22 (pages 28-30)?
When switching the deferred liabilities from SFO to FRS basis, the solutions imply that deferred revaluation is switching from 3.0% pa to 2.0% pa and therefore, as the pre-retirement discount rate has also fallen by 1.0% pa, the deferred pre-retirement net rate hasn't changed.
However, when setting out the bases on page 29, pension increases in deferment were set to be 2.0% pa on both the SFO and FRS basis. The SFO basis does have inflation = 3.0% pa but unless I've completely missed something I don't think this is what should be used in the deferred basis switch?
Assuming I'm right I can follow the rest of the example through with my deferred liabilities - just wanted to make sure I hadn't missed anything/the mistake is picked up for next year!
Thanks
Bekah