• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Forward/backward integral equations

P

phos2

Member
Could someone explain why we never consider k=j for the forward integral equations? If say we take a simple 3 state model {1,2,3} and we want to have the forward integral equation for p_{12}(t) then the way I think about it is we can go from 1->1 then the transition from 1 to 2, then we have the probability of staying in state 2 and we can product these and integrate. Similarly for going 1->3, transition from 3->2 and stay at 2. Why can we not have the probability of 1->2 at time (t-w), then the transition of 2 to 2 then the holding probability as before. The only reason I can think as to why we cannot have 1 -> 2 is being the transition of state 2 to 2 would be 0, but I cannot see why?
 

Attachments

  • fdi.PNG
    fdi.PNG
    84.2 KB · Views: 6
Forward integral equations focus on the last jump that occurs over the period. In the scenario you suggest a transition from 2 to 2 is not a jump - it's staying in the same place. So the last jump (given that you start off in state 1), would actually have been at some point earlier - and that's the jump to focus on.

So, focussing on a jump (ie a change of state) means we exclude k=j.
 
Back
Top