• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Exposed to Risk

A

avanbuiten

Member
Exposed to Risk - The Great Deception ?

Does anyone get the feeling that actually "exposed to risk" (E2R) in real life isn't half as complicated as the notes make out?

I used to do exposed to risk in my last job and I never had any problems with consistency between deaths and E2R.

Is it just a case of examiners representing something as more complicated than it is in reality?

Also, I'm interested to know who in their work has come across a definition of "age next birthday at policy anniversary in next curtate calendar year minus curtate calendar year of policy inception"? (And that is actually what you call it - why use five words when you can use 20?).

Personally I think it is a real shame that all the students I talk to say they don't understand it, and also those who have passed ct4 say the same thing. If they could just drop the silly complications and just be realistic I think we could all learn something useful. Insread, students just say "oh I can't do it" and don't learn anything!

What a joke! It would be funny if it wasn't us students who had to suffer the abuse.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top