• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Exam questions

B

Bliss

Member
Please can someone provide a simple explanation over the length of an answer given the command word in the question?

E.G. For list question - 3 or 4 words per point, probably 1/4 mark per point.

In particular I am after explanation over - DESCRIBE, DISCUSS, OUTLINE.

Will outline mean if 10 mark question, probably 20 points to make, whereas in discuss it would be 10 points but each point need depth (approx 4 points under each)
 
Hi Bliss

My understanding is that the Examiners work on the basis of 1/2 a mark for each simple statement/point/bit of description.

So, if I were asked to:

List: I'd produce a series of bullets, each stating a fact/point (ie just a few words for each). I'd expect to get 1/2 mark for each bullet.

Describe or outline: I'd produce a series of bullets. Each would contain a simple statement and a short description/explanation/example (so they would be longer than "list" bullets). I'd hope to get a whole mark for each of the important bullets and perhaps just half a mark for some of the more minor bullets.

So in an outline question, if I could come up with 20 bullets that's great. But maybe I would need fewer than that in order to get full marks (assuming they all got credit).

Discuss: similar approach to describe or outline, but I would ensure I covered advantages and disadvantages as well as more general points.

Explain: this is an instruction to go into detail on the issues. Rather than writing long paragraphs though, I would break those paragraphs into a series of bullets, grouped under some headings (much easier for a marker to mark this than a large solid block of text). Again, I'd work on the basis of 1/2mark for each simple statement.

Obviously, I'm assuming here that everything I write gets credit. In practice, only points that are sufficiently important/relevant will get credit.

Generally in SA4 it is important that your answers have both breadth and depth. So I would want to cover a broad range of ideas and go into most detail on the issues that are most important. This is just good business practice and generally applies whatever the command word

So, for example, in an outline question, I'd perhaps write more points on the most important issues - so my answer would cover a broad range of ideas, with most depth/detail on the most important issues.

Hope this helps.
 
Back
Top