K
kasparov
Member
It seems to be generally accepted that a small number of DB members might be better off transferring out of their DB scheme into DC and then taking an enhanced annuity if they are impaired lives. Presumably they would do this shortly before retiring.
Does this mean actuaries need to estimate how many people would do this? Also the withdrawal of these lives would decrease the average mortality so does the actuary have to allow for this as well?
Also are trustees under any legal or moral obligation to tell members they might be better off transferring out? (If not then not many people would find out about this option).
Does this mean actuaries need to estimate how many people would do this? Also the withdrawal of these lives would decrease the average mortality so does the actuary have to allow for this as well?
Also are trustees under any legal or moral obligation to tell members they might be better off transferring out? (If not then not many people would find out about this option).