• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Distribution of bonus for par products

A

ALEX_AK

Member
Hello I would like to know the reason for distributing the bonus for par products to SH as 1/9 of cost of the bonus. This is mentioned in core reading chapter 1 page 3.

I am just curious why are we using 1/9? Why not 1/11? Is there any regulation, history or guideline that states the formula?
 
Hello I would like to know the reason for distributing the bonus for par products to SH as 1/9 of cost of the bonus. This is mentioned in core reading chapter 1 page 3.

I am just curious why are we using 1/9? Why not 1/11? Is there any regulation, history or guideline that states the formula?

Almost all companies give 1/9th of the cost of bonus to shareholders (unless they give 100% of surplus to policyholders) although there are no regulations or guidelines that force them to do this.

We describe these companies as being 90/10 because the policyholders get 90% of the surplus through bonuses and the shareholders get 1/9th of 90% ie 10%.

The 90/10 split has arisen historically. Companies are free to pay different amounts to shareholders and can even change the split if their rules permit, but in practice almost all insurers have kept to 90/10 as they don't want to be out of line with the market.

Best wishes

Mark
 
Back
Top