• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Discrete time white noise

F

forza_bologna

Member
Hello,


I came across a revision notes exercise which asks if in case of a discrete time white noise process, the increments are stationary.

And the solution provided is: yes the increments are stationary for white noise process.

Does somebody know why is that?
I did not find anything on it in the theory.


Thank you.
 
As far as I understand increments of discrete white noise is not stationary, But White noise itself is stationary process.
 
I wonder if you're getting confused between independence and stationarity. The increments of a white noise process are not independent but they are stationary since theZn random variables are identically distributed. This means, for example, that the distribution of Z2-Z1 is the same as the distribution of Z3-Z2.
 
I wonder if you're getting confused between independence and stationarity. The increments of a white noise process are not independent but they are stationary since theZn random variables are identically distributed. This means, for example, that the distribution of Z2-Z1 is the same as the distribution of Z3-Z2.

Hi mam, I understand independence and stationarity, but there may be flaw on my other understanding.

reasoning for I said,"increments of discrete white noise is not stationary" is:-
suppose for Binomial Stochastic process(a discrete white noise) , \(Z_i \sim Binomial(n,p) \).
\( Z_{i+1}-Z_i \) can not have stationarity......... (as for \(Z_i=1~and~Z_i=n-2 \), \( Z_{i+1}-Z_i \) have different distribution. )
 
Last edited:
But the Z random variables are identically distributed, so Z2-Z1 has the same distribution as Z3-Z2 and Z4-Z3,etc.

For example, if Zn is normally distributed with mean mu and variance sigma^2, Z(n+1)-Zn has a normal with mean 0 and variance 2sigma^2. This doesn't depend on the value of n.
 
But the Z random variables are identically distributed, so Z2-Z1 has the same distribution as Z3-Z2 and Z4-Z3,etc.

For example, if Zn is normally distributed with mean mu and variance sigma^2, Z(n+1)-Zn has a normal with mean 0 and variance 2sigma^2. This doesn't depend on the value of n.

ohh Yes! Actually I was mistakenly thinking for conditional distribution as \( f(Z_{n+1}-Z_n|Z_n) \)....
 
Back
Top