• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Deriving forward prices

G

Gareth

Member
This doesn't really fit into any subject category (CT8/ST6/ST5), but it's something that occurred to me... can the forward price F_0 = e^(rT)S_0 be derived using the fundamental theorem of asset pricing?

Here's what has confused me:

Value of forward contract at time 0 = V_0

V_0 = E_Q( e^(-rT) (S_T - F_0) | S_0 )

by fundamental theorem of pricing, where Q is the risk-neutral prob measure and payoff of forward is S_T - F_0.

simplifying this gives e^(-rT) x (E_Q(S_T | S_0) - F_0)

Now, under Q, S_T is martingale so:

V_0 = e^(-rT) x (S_0 - F_0) = 0 since the forward has zero initial value. This implies F_0 = S_0.

Where's the fallacy in this argument?
 
gareth, ive seen this proof of forward prices by FTAP in a set of university lecture notes,.. so it can be derived this way..but as we know price of any derivative can be derived in this way

why you are not getting F0 = S o * exp (rT) is because in your argument you said that expectation under Q of teh terminal asset price ST / So is So - in fact it is So * exp (rT) - that should give the result - (excuse my poor notation and any miscomprehension of yours but still havent learned how to write equations on computer)
 
oh yes the answer was staring me in the face - thanks!

Funny how quickly you can forget the details of this stuff, makes life quite tricky (im doing ST5 and now and then a bit of ST6 reappears).
 
yeah but in ST5 they wont examine the proofs etc of pricing results, although one or two of the core reading chapters are direct replicas of ST6, (except there was a little proof on forward price in ST5 somewhere)

..though going back to your comment on sounfd revision, i presume you are talking about ST5 sound revision, i also have that CD and it was pretty good,
....though it would be pretty funny if the guy speaking on it tried to talk us through the forward price proof in the notes!
 
Back
Top