Thanks, Lindsay.
I'm also a little unclear on some of the discrimination descriptions:
1) Direct discrimintaion: differential treatment on the grounds of age isn't discrimination if it's a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
a) Is this just saying that prices can still be varied by age as long as it genuinely reflects risks or costs?
b) If this is the case, is the point here that any premiums varying by age need to be based on appropriate data
2) indirect discrimination - please can you give me an example of such so that I can understand this better?