• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

CWP WP and Gross Premium Reserve

Mateusz

Active Member
Hello,

Can I double check my understanding of one aspect of reserving for conventional with-profits contracts? I understand from course material (and very useful posts on the forum) that we need to be careful if a gross premium reserve is used for WP policies because of the loadings for expected future bonuses in the GP. But if we used a prudent interest rate in the valuation basis, I understand this would no longer be an issue, at least in theory?

For example, say we used 1% investment return in pricing, so if we expect to earn say 5%, the gross premium would be more than enough to cover for the guaranteed benefits and bonuses would be distributed. Then for reserves:
  • if we used 1% valuation interest rate to calculate the gross premium reserve, then we'd be assuming that those office premiums, when invested, would grow only to the guaranteed benefit. So under this assumption it'd be OK to include the guaranteed benefits only (incl. bonuses to date) in the PV of benefits and deduct the PV of full office premiums, correct? The source of surplus in each year would be driven by actual returns in excess of the assumed 1% for valuation.
  • the issue would arise if our valuation interest rate was higher than 1% used in pricing. For example, if it was linked to expected investment return, say 4%, that we'd deduct the PV of bonus loading in premiums at the outset and in future years we'd have little or no surplus to distribute, depending on actual returns
Does this sound reasonable?
Mateusz
Thank you!
 
Hello,

Can I double check my understanding of one aspect of reserving for conventional with-profits contracts? I understand from course material (and very useful posts on the forum) that we need to be careful if a gross premium reserve is used for WP policies because of the loadings for expected future bonuses in the GP. But if we used a prudent interest rate in the valuation basis, I understand this would no longer be an issue, at least in theory?

For example, say we used 1% investment return in pricing, so if we expect to earn say 5%, the gross premium would be more than enough to cover for the guaranteed benefits and bonuses would be distributed. Then for reserves:
  • if we used 1% valuation interest rate to calculate the gross premium reserve, then we'd be assuming that those office premiums, when invested, would grow only to the guaranteed benefit. So under this assumption it'd be OK to include the guaranteed benefits only (incl. bonuses to date) in the PV of benefits and deduct the PV of full office premiums, correct? The source of surplus in each year would be driven by actual returns in excess of the assumed 1% for valuation.
  • the issue would arise if our valuation interest rate was higher than 1% used in pricing. For example, if it was linked to expected investment return, say 4%, that we'd deduct the PV of bonus loading in premiums at the outset and in future years we'd have little or no surplus to distribute, depending on actual returns
Does this sound reasonable?
Mateusz
Thank you!
Hi Mateusz

This is exactly right.

In your first bullet you value the guarantees using a prudent set of assumptions so the future surpluses are expected to arise. This implicitly reserves for future bonuses.

In your second bullet you value the guarantees using a realistic set of assumptions so no surpluses are expected to arise. So you have only reserved for the guarantees and have made no reserve for future bonuses. You could then have a separate reserve that explicitly covered the expected future bonuses.

Best wishes

Mark
 
Back
Top