S
snake
Member
Just wondering
If the exams are meant to test our understanding of the course, then is there an argument against the latest exam being too difficult to do in exam conditions?
I mean, if they are testing our understanding, then surely there should have been more questions on other aspects of the course and also less emphasis on our "creativity" in solving the ridiculous question that they asked us at the end of the exam.
I think that you could argue that if somebody was required to do that question in NON-exam conditions, they would have found it difficult, nevermind the fact that there was a time constraint etc etc.
I wonder if there's a system for complaining about the actual level of difficulty of the exam and whether it's ever been successful in demonstrating that the exam itself was pointless cos it was so hard that noone could have done it in whatever time was set.
If the exams are meant to test our understanding of the course, then is there an argument against the latest exam being too difficult to do in exam conditions?
I mean, if they are testing our understanding, then surely there should have been more questions on other aspects of the course and also less emphasis on our "creativity" in solving the ridiculous question that they asked us at the end of the exam.
I think that you could argue that if somebody was required to do that question in NON-exam conditions, they would have found it difficult, nevermind the fact that there was a time constraint etc etc.
I wonder if there's a system for complaining about the actual level of difficulty of the exam and whether it's ever been successful in demonstrating that the exam itself was pointless cos it was so hard that noone could have done it in whatever time was set.