• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

CT3 Q&A 4.15

shdh

Ton up Member
I need help in question 4.15 of the question Bank.
How did we get the null hypothesis?
From where did the size of the test come?
How did we conclude that it is not significant at even 10% level?
Why did we count only upto 5 in the second part of the question?

Hoping for an early response. Exams ahead!
Thank you
 
We're testing whether the person can do better than chance, ie 1 in 5 probability of getting it right via guessing.
Size is the same as level which is the same as the p-value.
Since the probability is greater than 10% hence can't reject it at the 10% level.
We counted up to 4 (0, 1, 2, 3, 4) not 5. We did this to find out the number of cards you could get right with 95% probability by guessing.
 
Back
Top