Howard O'Connor
Active Member
Hi all,
Just a couple of queries about CT2-04:
1) In CT2-04 page 16 fifth paragraph the notes state, “A 25p par value share issued at a price of 40p may only be 80% “paid up” ie only 32p was originally invested in the company.” However surely the premium must have been paid in full (as written in CT2-02 page 6 second paragraph), hence the partly-paid share described would have had the 15p premium paid in full and 20p from the 25p par value paid up. Is this correct?
2) Several times the notes state that securities that are issued in smaller numbers have lower marketability relative to securities issued in larger numbers. Why is the opposite not the case, as if one assumes that the demand for the securities is equal in each case then securities issued in smaller quantities would be under higher demand and hence it would be easier to find a buyer or seller?
Thank you
Just a couple of queries about CT2-04:
1) In CT2-04 page 16 fifth paragraph the notes state, “A 25p par value share issued at a price of 40p may only be 80% “paid up” ie only 32p was originally invested in the company.” However surely the premium must have been paid in full (as written in CT2-02 page 6 second paragraph), hence the partly-paid share described would have had the 15p premium paid in full and 20p from the 25p par value paid up. Is this correct?
2) Several times the notes state that securities that are issued in smaller numbers have lower marketability relative to securities issued in larger numbers. Why is the opposite not the case, as if one assumes that the demand for the securities is equal in each case then securities issued in smaller quantities would be under higher demand and hence it would be easier to find a buyer or seller?
Thank you