• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

"cross" answering

M

misterh

Member
This probably applies more to the later exams where the number of questions are fewer and as a result they are "chunkier". Quite often there can be a 50 mark question with 5 or 6 parts all under the same topic - sometimes parts of the question are relating to very similiar issues/areas. How generous are the markers when it somes to students putting part of the answer in one part that is probably more relevant in another. Sometimes it is easy to get your wires crossed when answering questions in such a short space of time and can easily loose track of which part you are answering. For example, if a marker is looking over an answer in part (iii) and thinks this part of the students answer is actually part of markers solutions for part (ii) and both (ii) and (iii) are similiar would they give the student the marks or would marks be lost?
thanks for reading - any ideas greatly appreciated tho probably someone with previous marking experience could quickly explain their practices on marking re. the above
 
This probably applies more to the later exams where the number of questions are fewer and as a result they are "chunkier". Quite often there can be a 50 mark question with 5 or 6 parts all under the same topic - sometimes parts of the question are relating to very similiar issues/areas. How generous are the markers when it somes to students putting part of the answer in one part that is probably more relevant in another. Sometimes it is easy to get your wires crossed when answering questions in such a short space of time and can easily loose track of which part you are answering. For example, if a marker is looking over an answer in part (iii) and thinks this part of the students answer is actually part of markers solutions for part (ii) and both (ii) and (iii) are similiar would they give the student the marks or would marks be lost?
thanks for reading - any ideas greatly appreciated tho probably someone with previous marking experience could quickly explain their practices on marking re. the above

Acted ASET does say marks can be gained this way.
 
I believe you won't get marks in earlier sections for using info directly provided in later sections.
Also the early sections may be general (e.g. on liability insurance) and the later parts more specific (e.g. employers liability).
You need to ensure you keep your answer in the first section broad, and not be 'funnelled' into the specifics too early. (e.g. by focusing on EL in this case)
 
Back
Top