Darragh Kelly
Ton up Member
Hi,
I have a few question's in relation to chapter 19 of the notes.
3.1 Relevance and credibility of past data (page 7 and 8)
- Changes in the mix of homogeneous groups within the past data
Would an example of this be the a group of people that was grouped together because of say underwriting (all suffered from previous health condition), but then after 10 years further underwriting has been completed and some are not cleared from medical conditions and therefore groups will change?
- Changes in the mix of homogeneous groups to which the assumptions apply
If I am correct the interpretation of the above point, struggling to see how the second point differs.
3.2 Use of real values (page 7 and 8)
Past data for price inflation can be very useful in determining other economic assumptions, as conversion of past economic data into real terms will often remove much of the fluctuation.
I don’t really get the second part of this statement regarding conversion of data eliminates fluctuations?
For this reason, actuaries often develop a set of assumptions in real terms. To the extent that all the factors affecting future cashflows can be determined relative to price inflation, real parameters are all that are required.
Does this mean the financial parameters such as discount rate etc? And price inflation is the benchmark they are derived from so they are in real terms?
3.2 One off Impacts (Page 9)
An example of this could be a material change in the value of fixed interest assets as a result of the central bank or government changing short-term interest rates materially, or as a result of a change in the level of government bond issues
The first part of statement is ok I think – basically if the short-term interest rate changes, then the coupon payments of a government bond/fixed-interest asset will change. But for the second part regarding the level of government bonds issued – does this mean the price that they are issued at? So you make a big return as if price increases you can sell asset (as you bought at lower price) at increased price?
Section 5.1 Margins (page 14)
The basis actually chosen for pricing, inclusive of margins, will fix the risk the company will be subject to once the contract is issued at that price.
Why does this fix the risk? Does having margins not reduce the risk? I assume basis means the assumptions?
Section 5.3 Profit Criterion (page 15)
For example, a possible criterion for an insurer is that the net present value of profits emerging from each of its product lines is a predetermined proportion of the distribution costs. Such a criterion reduces the bias towards products with high commission rewards in the distribution system.
So basically this method (predetermined proportion) is used to highlight/isolate products with very high commission? How does it work exactly and what is the issue with high commission? Not sure exactly what it means.
Many thanks in advance,
Darragh
I have a few question's in relation to chapter 19 of the notes.
3.1 Relevance and credibility of past data (page 7 and 8)
- Changes in the mix of homogeneous groups within the past data
Would an example of this be the a group of people that was grouped together because of say underwriting (all suffered from previous health condition), but then after 10 years further underwriting has been completed and some are not cleared from medical conditions and therefore groups will change?
- Changes in the mix of homogeneous groups to which the assumptions apply
If I am correct the interpretation of the above point, struggling to see how the second point differs.
3.2 Use of real values (page 7 and 8)
Past data for price inflation can be very useful in determining other economic assumptions, as conversion of past economic data into real terms will often remove much of the fluctuation.
I don’t really get the second part of this statement regarding conversion of data eliminates fluctuations?
For this reason, actuaries often develop a set of assumptions in real terms. To the extent that all the factors affecting future cashflows can be determined relative to price inflation, real parameters are all that are required.
Does this mean the financial parameters such as discount rate etc? And price inflation is the benchmark they are derived from so they are in real terms?
3.2 One off Impacts (Page 9)
An example of this could be a material change in the value of fixed interest assets as a result of the central bank or government changing short-term interest rates materially, or as a result of a change in the level of government bond issues
The first part of statement is ok I think – basically if the short-term interest rate changes, then the coupon payments of a government bond/fixed-interest asset will change. But for the second part regarding the level of government bonds issued – does this mean the price that they are issued at? So you make a big return as if price increases you can sell asset (as you bought at lower price) at increased price?
Section 5.1 Margins (page 14)
The basis actually chosen for pricing, inclusive of margins, will fix the risk the company will be subject to once the contract is issued at that price.
Why does this fix the risk? Does having margins not reduce the risk? I assume basis means the assumptions?
Section 5.3 Profit Criterion (page 15)
For example, a possible criterion for an insurer is that the net present value of profits emerging from each of its product lines is a predetermined proportion of the distribution costs. Such a criterion reduces the bias towards products with high commission rewards in the distribution system.
So basically this method (predetermined proportion) is used to highlight/isolate products with very high commission? How does it work exactly and what is the issue with high commission? Not sure exactly what it means.
Many thanks in advance,
Darragh