How did folks feel that it went? I thought on the whole it was quite a fair paper although there did seem to be a distinct absence of some topics... expected utility anybody? I liked that the "big" question was split into two 10mark questions although I didn't particularly like either question.
I had similar thoughts. Didn't have much to say on the price discrimination question... not 10 marks worth anyway. I was also somewhat distracted by a very good-looking girl in the front row. Does that count as bad exam technique?
