K
Karnan Narendrakumar
Member
I'm well into my revision however I have major concerns over the format in which the exam is being conducted. My concern is around the additional time it takes to type actuarial notation, which forms the majority of this course, compared to physically writing on paper. Not to mention jotting ideas such as time lines on paper helps with "How to go about answering the question" which of course won't be seen by a marker.
So far, after much practice, i have been unable to complete a past paper inside what would be exam time by typing on a computer. In fact it's taking me nearly three times as long as compared to doing it on paper.
Nearly all our lives, we have conducted exams on paper and i find it extremely unfair that we are expected to learn how to do exams on the computer in a matter of months with no additional time nor any substantial resources to bridge this gap.
I am worried that i won't be fairly judged on my knowledge and application of the course but rather my speed of typing. Should lack of computer proficiency really be a factor in deciding between a pass/fail? Why is scanning the exam not an option to us? I feel that no matter how well i understand the course and its syllabus, I will have a high possibility of failing purely because i can't type fast. And it could take years of practice to type quickly. I've already seen a response in the FAQs regarding concerns around typing but I'm seeking more clarity as to why we don't have extra time and what options there are available to us who aren't technically proficient other than "try your best"
So far, after much practice, i have been unable to complete a past paper inside what would be exam time by typing on a computer. In fact it's taking me nearly three times as long as compared to doing it on paper.
Nearly all our lives, we have conducted exams on paper and i find it extremely unfair that we are expected to learn how to do exams on the computer in a matter of months with no additional time nor any substantial resources to bridge this gap.
I am worried that i won't be fairly judged on my knowledge and application of the course but rather my speed of typing. Should lack of computer proficiency really be a factor in deciding between a pass/fail? Why is scanning the exam not an option to us? I feel that no matter how well i understand the course and its syllabus, I will have a high possibility of failing purely because i can't type fast. And it could take years of practice to type quickly. I've already seen a response in the FAQs regarding concerns around typing but I'm seeking more clarity as to why we don't have extra time and what options there are available to us who aren't technically proficient other than "try your best"