• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Chapter22 Costing guarantees & Options

G

Genesiss

Member
This chapter is frustrating!:mad:

Qn1:How can one tell from the question which of Conventional or North American methods to use? Example 2 & the example immediately after the core reading on the conventional method have confused me.

Qn2: Example 1....can someone please shed light on the formula for EPV(Benefits) and EPV(premiums)...why is the option being valued as a term assurance?This seems to run through all the examples...is it the only/easier way or am I missing something???

Qn3:Example 2 which shows the P(option) of 321.24....I do not understand though I can see it being combined with the basic premium somewhere in the calculation for those lives taking the option?. Also how is this different from the extra premium being computed??

HEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!:confused:
 
I think I have an idea on the claculation of EPV(Benefits) for example 2 concentional method. However just to check my understanding, here goes.
the policyholder has an option to increase to 200,000 the DEATH benefit sum assured from year 5. the last term of that equation shows something like;

100,000 {A x:n + 100,000 A x:n}. so the policyholder has the usual 100,000 from the original policy and adds an additional 100,000 on the death benefit (whch is valued as a term assurance).
is there a better way fo capturing the total benefit using actuarial notation?
 
Back
Top