• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Chapter 9 Question 9.6

A

Alele

Member
We are told that the aggregate claims are normally distributed with mean 0.7P and standard deviation 2P.
P = 300 * 5000 = 1 500 000 = 1.5m
According to the solutions, the standard deviation is 0.173m.
How did we end up with standard deviation = 0.173m and not standard deviation = 2 * 1.5 = 3m
 
Here, aggregate claims for a particular type of policy is ~N[0.7P, (2P)²]
So for n policies, S~ N(n×mu, n×sigma²)
P is the annual premium here and there are 300 policies, given P=£5000.
Then mu= 0.7×5000 and sigma=2×5000=10000
So..S~N(300×0.7×5000, 300×10000²)
i.e. S~N[1.05m, (0.173m)²]
 
Here, aggregate claims for a particular type of policy is ~N[0.7P, (2P)²]
So for n policies, S~ N(n×mu, n×sigma²)
P is the annual premium here and there are 300 policies, given P=£5000.
Then mu= 0.7×5000 and sigma=2×5000=10000
So..S~N(300×0.7×5000, 300×10000²)
i.e. S~N[1.05m, (0.173m)²]

That is crystal clear. Thank you very much for the quick response Bharti Singla.
 
I was doing this question and also have a question but in regards to the premiums my reading of the problem made me think that the premiums were annual therefore for the policies sold in the first year we get 2x premiums because we are evaluating probability of ruin at the end of the 2nd year for the expenses they were specified that you only pay expenses on writing of the policy. So U(2) = 0.1m + 100x500x2 + 200x5000 - 300x0.2x5000, am I interpreting the question wrong?
 
You seem to have assumed that the 100 policies that were sold in the first year have a premium in the second year. they are one year policies. So they expire.
 
You seem to have assumed that the 100 policies that were sold in the first year have a premium in the second year. they are one year policies. So they expire.

And in the next example given below this qus. , they have assumed two-yearly policies. Right?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2017-03-16-15-07-33_com.adobe.reader_1489657154037.jpg
    Screenshot_2017-03-16-15-07-33_com.adobe.reader_1489657154037.jpg
    115.6 KB · Views: 3
Not necessarily. They're just saying the premium income they get every year. If one year policies then this will be just different policies.
 
But sir, how do we know it? They have just asked the prob. of ruin at the end of 2nd year and considered both years. And in q9.6 also, they have asked to find the prob. of ruin at the end of 2nd year and considered only 2nd year?
 
No in Q9.6 they used the premium gained over 2 years. But it was expressed as 100 policies in the first year and 200 policies in the second year. Whereas the next example the just use "premium income per year" - so we aren't looking at the number of policies and which year but just the income that comes in using the standard formula.
 
Back
Top