• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Chapter 2: Stochastics

J

jensen

Member
Can anyone confirm my understanding, please:

1) Independent increments => Markov process

2) iid => Stationary => Markovian

are these correct?

Thanks.
 
My Idea

The first one seem to be correct as independent Increments imply Markov process. If you want to check whether or not a stochastic process is Markov, the following rules can be used:
1. Check if it has independent increments, if yes then it is markov
2. if it does not have independent increments, it may still be if it satisfy the markov definition.

For the second one,White noise is strictly stationary but white noise is a set of iid random variable. But am sure that a stationary process does not imply markov.

My opinion

Can anyone confirm my understanding, please:

1) Independent increments => Markov process

2) iid => Stationary => Markovian

are these correct?

Thanks.
 
The first one seem to be correct as independent Increments imply Markov process. If you want to check whether or not a stochastic process is Markov, the following rules can be used:
1. Check if it has independent increments, if yes then it is markov
2. if it does not have independent increments, it may still be if it satisfy the markov definition.

For the second one,White noise is strictly stationary but white noise is a set of iid random variable. But am sure that a stationary process does not imply markov.

My opinion

Thanks Maryam.

So if I understand you, stationary does not mean Markov, but iid (which is happens to be also stationary) implies Markov.

Is it possible to have a process that is stationary but not iid?

Thanks.
 
Yes I agree - iid increments must mean markov because the future state will only depend on the current state and the value of the increrment. So, because the increment is independent of everything that's happened before, then the future value of the state must also be independent of what's happened before - ie Markov.
Stationarity just means that the statistical properties of the process are the same at all time points. A non-Markov process could easily be stationary (many time-series processes fall into this description).
Robert
 
ok, so:

1) iid means Markov
2) stationary does not necessarily mean Markov, and
3) stationarity has got nothing to do with iid, or vice versa.

Thanks!
 
Back
Top