• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

chapter 18, Page 24, question 8

NewStudent

Active Member
Is this correct way to find value of endowment assurance payable immediately on death with x=50, n=2, i=.04 ?
Will this approach get credit in exam?
IMG_20190321_084906.jpg
 
ctt5.jpg


The method above is the one I was taught by my Prof to solve this kind of question in general. However, your method that involves bringing in the annuity function should be acceptable and in fact is required in the Joint Life calculations because there is no table for joint life assurances under any basis.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@NewStudent - question 8 at the end of chapter 18 asks for the exact value of the assurance, if you've got a constant force of mortality between ages.

Step 3 in your workings uses an approximation to convert the annuity-due to a continuously payable annuity, so you've got an approximate rather than an exact value here. This means that your approach is not likely to get credit in the exam if you've specifically been asked for an exact value.

@Calm - your first approach (in black) doesn't quite work. This is because the survival benefit under this endowment assurance will always be paid at time 2. Applying the \( (1+i)^{\frac{1}{2}} \) to the whole \( \require{enclose} A_{50:{\enclose{actuarial}{2}}} \) means that you're bringing both the death and survival benefits forward by half a year.

The correct approximation for an endowment assurance is \( (1+i)^{\frac{1}{2}} \require{enclose} A^1_{50:{\enclose{actuarial}{2}}} + \frac{D_{52}}{D_{50}} \) , i.e. you need to split the death and survival benefits up because the timing of survival benefits is always the same.
 
@Calm - your first approach (in black) doesn't quite work. This is because the survival benefit under this endowment assurance will always be paid at time 2. Applying the \( (1+i)^{\frac{1}{2}} \) to the whole \( \require{enclose} A_{50:{\enclose{actuarial}{2}}} \) means that you're bringing both the death and survival benefits forward by half a year.

The correct approximation for an endowment assurance is \( (1+i)^{\frac{1}{2}} \require{enclose} A^1_{50:{\enclose{actuarial}{2}}} + \frac{D_{52}}{D_{50}} \) , i.e. you need to split the death and survival benefits up because the timing of survival benefits is always the same.

Thanks for pointing that out, didn't realise doing the steps in that order was effectively making the pure endowment component "continuously payable" which isn't true.
 
Back
Top