• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Chapter 17 section 3.1

C

clueless

Member
Can anyone explain the first paragragh " ... A log link function is normally used since this results in a multiplicative model structure of factors..."?

Also the last paragragh "Alternatively, ...". Why this leads to identical model form in the case of the Poisson model?
 
a possible answer

I've tried to understand the material in the context of the stuff in chapter 17, so forgive me if i'm off on a tangent.

I think the log link function thing is explained by the basic maths behind logs.

Say you had some relativities relating to different factors - call them a, b and c. Their combined effect would be a * b * c (lets call this y). This is clearly multiplicative, like how we normally look at relativities. Now if we chose to model the log of y, then log y = the sum of the logs of a, b and c. which is additive.

In the usual set up for GLMs we look at our link function g(mu) to relate the mean of the response to the linear predictor. In the case of an identity link function g(mu) = mu. if it was a log link function, we look at g(mu) = log mu. This will turn the multiplicative model above into an additive one. :D
 
Thanks for helping out. I thought this place is hopeless.

Using the motor example.

Factor A (age) Young 3 Old 1

Factor B (Car grp) Low 1 High 2

The expected relativity (mu) for a young driver with a high car group is 3 times 2. Are you saying that in a normal GLM set-up, we would add up the relativities. But this would lead to 3 plus 2, which is not right. Hence we think of a way to get around it by using the log, such that the item we are interested is now log(mu), and the linear predictor is now log3 plus log2 = log6. This is then regarded as the estimate for log(mu)

Is my understanding now correct?
 
Your understanding appears correct now.

Looked at another way, if we choose our link function g to be log, then g^(-1) is the exponential function. Hence mu = exp(linear predictor). The exponential function has the property that

exp[sum(A,B)] = product[exp(A), exp(B)]

which results in a model where we can multiply the effects of different factors together.
 
Back
Top