MorningtonCrescent, I would have thought that your reasoning implies that any allocation method which takes diversification into account violates, paradoxically, the diversification benefit principle.
Take Coralie's original example:
In the example above, if we use a method that does allow for correlations, we end up allocating more to A and B than if they were considered separately?
I've read through a number of past posts around chapter 7 but haven't found this question mentioned - apologies if I missed it, or if there's something obvious I'm missing!
EDIT: ok, so the obvious thing I missed is that the allocation doesn't need to total 90 - it could for example be [30,30,20] for [A,B,C]
Last edited by a moderator: Jun 8, 2015