• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Ch 12 Competing risk

D

DonnieDarkest

Member
Hi,

I'm having trouble understanding the derivation of the partial differential equations in Chapter 12 Competing Risks. In the simple example, a transition is possible from A to R, from R to D and from A to D.

I think I understand why we need v=0 (tranition intensity from R to D) in order for (aq)d = pAD ...otherwise pAD would also include the possibility of a transition from A to R then from R to D, with v=0 this is now not possible.

When this logic is extented, why do we also need to set v=0 in order for (aq)r = pAR ?
Is (aq)r = pAR by definition regardless of what v is?

Thanks!
 
The key here is that there are two types of notation being used, and they only end up being equal in certain circumstances.

So:

t(aq)r = P(individual who is currently in the active state leaving this state due to retirement in time period t in the presence of other decrements)

tpAR = P(individual is in state R at time t given that they were in the active state at time 0)

Note that the first of these is to do (only) with the probability of leaving a state in a certain time period. The second is specifically to do with the state and individual occupies at time t.

For an individual to be in state R at time t, they must leave state A by retirement at some point during the time period t, AND they must not leave state R after they arrive.

The only way to ensure that they don't leave state R is to have v=0. This means that we are certain that once an individual gets to state R, they must stay there as there is no way out (R is then technically called an absorbing state).

This gives us the equality t(aq)r = tpAR (where v=0). We can then be certain that if the individual has left state A due to retirement between time 0 and time t (first part of the equation), they must be in state R at time t (second part of the equation), as once they get into R, they're stuck there.

Hoping this clears it up.

M.
 
Back
Top