M
mantlegen
Member
What do you think about Apr 09 paper? I wanna give up during the 15mins reading time.......gosh....
What do you think about Apr 09 paper? I wanna give up during the 15mins reading time.......gosh....![]()
How did you guys find question 2? It is something similar to Sept 99 Q paper right?
How did you tackle the 8000 to 4000??? I
You can work out the approx reduction using the assumptions quite easily..... I didn't realise the course went back so far.... Surely if you did that much revision it should be an easy pass!
I thought it was a good paper.
The first question wasn't hard at all - it was just that the reading excript they gave you was total rubbish and a little bit confusing. Especially if you have forgotten everything about immunisation.
CA3 - most difficult exam ever.
Perhaps this is the Institute's way of telling us to sit the practical exam.
i note the price of exam is £705 - now for that price what will the pass rates be?
I found the communication of question 1 terrible....so I ignored the entire thing and wrote a response based on what I know about immunisation, a risky technique I thought. It would be unfair to expect sitters to discart the info as rubbish (when often the info provided is completely acceptable) and rely on their own knowledge...as this is testing communication afterall....they may realise this and print an examiners report such as "students generally messed up and didn't understand the concept of immunisation at all, but were not heavily penalised for this" tehe
Question 1 WAS completely terrible and anyone who says otherwise is a complete prat who just wants to make everyone else feel small and themselves look like a freakin' actuarial genius. Get over yourself.