Suppose the table shown below is constructed at 31/12/2007.
This table shows the cumulative amounts paid.
Settlement Delay in Years (development year)
0 1 2
Year of accident
2005 2100 2000 1900
2006 2050 1950
2007 2000
As you can see from the table all the development factors are less than 1 which implies over-reserving.
Am I correct that over-reserving is dealt with automatically by getting lower cumulative amounts in the future years?
Also the oustanding amounts would be negative which means that the outstanding reserves would be negative, how would this be dealt with?
Many Thanks
Last edited by a moderator: Jan 4, 2009