• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Autocovariance & Autocorrelation

C

CorkActuary

Member
Calculate the autocovariance function funtion (γk) and autocorrelation function (ρk) of the following first order moving process:

Xt = u + Et + BEt-1


I know γk/γ0 = ρk

But to calculate γk?

γk = Cov(Xt,Xt-k) = Cov(u + Et + BEt-1,Xt-k) = ??

Where do you go from here to get γk?

γ0 = Bσ^2 (Am I correct here??)
 
For MA processes, write it out in full for each lag...

γ0 = Cov(Xt,Xt) = Cov(Et + BEt-1,
Et + BEt-1)

Et is a series of INDEPENDENT identically distributed random variables.
Covariances are just like multiplying out brackets but keep the covariance outside.
So, notice how I've written it so that only when the time period on the Et is the same, is there a non-zero covariance because the Et are INDEPENDENT of each other.

γ0 = Cov(Xt,Xt) = Cov(Et + BEt-1,
Et + BEt-1)

= σ^2 + B^2σ^2

Similarly

γ1 = Cov(Xt,Xt-1) = Cov(Et + BEt-1,
Et-1 + BEt-2)

= Bσ^2

And

γ2 = Cov(Xt,Xt-2) = Cov(Et + BEt-1,
Et-2 + BEt-3)

= 0

You can see that there is no covariance for lag 2 and beyond.
More generally, for an MA(q), γ cuts out for lags > q

John
 
PS Sorry that's annoying - whatever software this thing uses has taken away my spaces so that you can't notice how I've written it out :-(

I want the Et to appear directly underneath the Et
the Et-1 to appear directly underneath the Et-1

I've got a slide that demonstrates this nicely so just give me a shout johnpotter@bpp.com if still not clear.
 
Like this?? You can use the CODE tags (#button in this site's editor) to keep characters of a single fixed width (I uses same width as W rather than what it actually needs to occupy) maintain spaces etc (or at least that's how it works in general elsewhere). Useful for primitive alignments using spaces :p (and old school ASCII art).


John's revised post below

For MA processes, write it out in full for each lag...

Code:
γ0 = Cov(Xt,Xt) = Cov(Et + BEt-1,
                                Et + BEt-1)
Et is a series of INDEPENDENT identically distributed random variables.
Covariances are just like multiplying out brackets but keep the covariance outside.
So, notice how I've written it so that only when the time period on the Et is the same, is there a non-zero covariance because the Et are INDEPENDENT of each other.

Code:
γ0 = Cov(Xt,Xt) = Cov(Et + BEt-1,
                                Et + BEt-1)

= σ^2 + B^2σ^2
Similarly

Code:
γ1 = Cov(Xt,Xt-1) = Cov(Et + BEt-1,
                                           Et-1 + BEt-2)

= Bσ^2
And

Code:
γ2 = Cov(Xt,Xt-2) = Cov(Et + BEt-1,
                                                   Et-2 + BEt-3)

= 0

You can see that there is no covariance for lag 2 and beyond.
More generally, for an MA(q), γ cuts out for lags > q

John
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top