A
Alan2007
Member
I understand most parts of the solution in the Examiners Report given on page 8.
Question. A life insurance compnay sells only conventional with-profit life insurance contracts. It uses a net premium method for its statutory valuation.
(ii) The value of the assets backing with profits liabilities has fallen by 25% since the last valuation.
Explain why the satatutory values of the liabilities is unlikely to have fallen by the same percentage?
Examiners Solution
The impact of a decrease in the value of assets on the valuation basis depends on the mix of assets and how much fall in assets is absorbed by the free estate.
Does the free estate means free assets?
If the decrease in value of assets is primarily in the value of equities investments then this would be absorbed by a reduction in the investment reserve and would have little impact on the liabilities.
Can you please explain this?
If the decrease were accompanied by an increase in interest rates this would decrease the value of liabilities because the valuation interest would also rise.
Would for example the value of equities and bonds fall because its cashflows are discounted at a higher interest rate? Thus the value of equities and bonds would fall because of an increase in interest rates
However, this would not necessarily mean that the value of liabilities would decrease by the same amount as assets because:
Many Thanks
Question. A life insurance compnay sells only conventional with-profit life insurance contracts. It uses a net premium method for its statutory valuation.
(ii) The value of the assets backing with profits liabilities has fallen by 25% since the last valuation.
Explain why the satatutory values of the liabilities is unlikely to have fallen by the same percentage?
Examiners Solution
The impact of a decrease in the value of assets on the valuation basis depends on the mix of assets and how much fall in assets is absorbed by the free estate.
Does the free estate means free assets?
If the decrease in value of assets is primarily in the value of equities investments then this would be absorbed by a reduction in the investment reserve and would have little impact on the liabilities.
Can you please explain this?
If the decrease were accompanied by an increase in interest rates this would decrease the value of liabilities because the valuation interest would also rise.
Would for example the value of equities and bonds fall because its cashflows are discounted at a higher interest rate? Thus the value of equities and bonds would fall because of an increase in interest rates
However, this would not necessarily mean that the value of liabilities would decrease by the same amount as assets because:
the assets and liabilties are unlikely to be matched
the valuation interest rate change also changes the amount of net premium meaning that the liabilities are less sensitive than assets of a similiar term/
any changes to the implicit allowance for future bonuses will have an impact
the increase in the valuation rate may be limited by any restrictions in the maximum reinvestment rate allowed
Many Thanks