• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

April 2011 - Q36

R

Rebecca.Thomas

Member
I'm obviously not expecting a reply to this before the exam, but I'm curious...

April 2011, Q36 - "Explain the effect on the multiplier of an increase in income tax rate".

My thought process was (and still is, even after reading the solution):
higher tax rate -> less disposable income -> 'poorer' people -> less able to save and hence higher mpc -> increased multiplier

Basically I'm thinking that higher the tax, the less disposable income, the higher the proportion that is spent on basic essentials, leaving less propensity to save and hence higher propensity to consume.


I'm sure I'm missing some "bigger picture" here!
 
Hi Rebecca,

No, the point here is that a higher tax rate will mean that people have less money to consume, so that the mpcd will decrease, leading to a fall in the multiplier.

Or even more directly, an increase in the tax rate will lead to an increase in the marginal propensity to pay tax (mpt). Consequently, more money will be withdrawn from the circular flow of income, resulting in a smaller multiplier.

Remember that the multiplier can be calculated (in terms of the marginal propensities to withdraw spending from the circular flow) as:

k = 1/(mps + mpt + mpm)

So, an increase in the mpt will lead to an increase in the denominator and hence a fall in the the multiplier.

I hope this helps.

Graham :)
 
Back
Top