It was a pretty fair paper... in line with the last few. Not much more to say I guess... I don't think there was anything tricky or unusual in the paper.
Agreed, thought it was fair and straight forward. I messed up my reversionary question as I had it axy-ay, instead of the other way round. Because of that thought i'd come back to computational question, then of course ended up running out of time as I spent too long on last 2 questions. Gutted!
