• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

April 2006 Question 8 (ii) & (iii)

P

Paapi

Member
For part(ii:confused: ) you are asked to calculate the posterior distribution of theta.
I thought you would derive the posterior the normal way wich is prior multiplies by the likelihood interms of x (as is always the case).
But here they have taken X = total number of claims in year i = n1Y1/c, and then shown the likelihood interms of this new X = n1Y1 /c

How do you know that you need to use this result of X?

In part (iii) The first line to this solution is -

E(Y|y1,y2) = c(1+ r)^2 * E(X3|y1,y2)

Whats the logic behind this result?? This question seems to be the hardest in the paper.
 
For part(ii:confused: ) you are asked to calculate the posterior distribution of theta.
I thought you would derive the posterior the normal way wich is prior multiplies by the likelihood interms of x (as is always the case).
But here they have taken X = total number of claims in year i = n1Y1/c, and then shown the likelihood interms of this new X = n1Y1 /c

How do you know that you need to use this result of X?

In part (iii) The first line to this solution is -

E(Y|y1,y2) = c(1+ r)^2 * E(X3|y1,y2)

Whats the logic behind this result?? This question seems to be the hardest in the paper.

This was a messy question. I do recommend our ASET or revision notes (from which I copy bits of this).

How would you know? It's not clear - but it does say given y1 and y2 where the Yi's are the total claim amounts but we have the number of claims has a Poisson.

For year one:

• the average total claim amount per policy was y1
• the overall total claim amount for the whole group was y1n1
• the overall total number of claims was y1n1/c (as each claim is c)

So X1 = y1n1/c ~ Poi(n1θ)

Similarly since claims are (1+r) more expensive in year 2 we will have:

X2 = y2n2/c(1+r) ~ Poi(n2θ)

And for year 3 we will have:

X3 = y3n3/c(1+r)² ~ Poi(n3θ)
 
Back
Top