• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

April 11 q1 (vii)

A

AAStuck

Member
Hoping someone can shed some light on this...

The q states that the scheme has closed to new entrants and accrual.( So the scheme now has deffereds and pensioners.)

The q asks for 4 actions....the examiners report gives 6 possible actions.
4 of these say "may/may not prevent the need for cessation of accrual"

Im confused as to why this has even been considered (say half mark each.....thats 2 marks) when the q stated the scheme had already closed to accrual ?

Hope that makes sense ?

Im concerned about being told an action has occured, being asked what action to take next......and being expected to answer with "the original action was not necesary..."

Thanks
 
April 2011

Hi AAStuck

I agree that this wouldn't normally be something that would get you marks.

But note the unusual situation - a not particularly strong sponsor, but an extremely strong parent.

So, it may not be unreasonable in this situation for the parent to step in.

Best wishes

Stuart

Stuart Underwood
ActEd Tutor
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top