• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Apr'07 Q1

StartedThinking

Keen member
Hi,

The question says that the project is funded by means of issue of loan stock which has already been arranged and to which the company is committed. Finance raised from loan stock is 8% interest payment, and if the project is not undertaken, the proceeds invested at a return of 6%. The project has +ve NPV at 10%.

Why is the opportunity cost 6% instead of 8% because I need to pay a interest payments on the loan raised although I get 6% by investing in financial instrument. Please explain. Thanks in advance.
 
This was a slightly strange question. The core reading does describe the opportunity cost of capital as the return on a stock market investment that you forego in order to invest in the project that is being selected. As you say, the money is being borrowed, so the idea of something being foregone is not quite there. But if the project is not undertaken, the question does make it clear that any funds will be invested at 6% in the market.
 
Back
Top