• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Annuity Risk

L

LloydieW1990

Member
Please could somebody explain the penultimate paragraph on page 6 of chapter 40?

It essentially says that to mitigate the risk of annuity terms being worse than expected due to falls in bond yields, one should switch to bonds that back the annuities as retirement approaches. If bond yields falls, the cost of purchasing annuities will rise. However, this should be offset by a rise in the value of the retirement fund.

I'm struggling with the last two sentences. The value of the fund will rise but by a smaller amount than expected since bond yields are lower. Does the "cost of purchasing annuities" mean the cost relative to before the fall in bonds as the member now has less purchasing power than before? If so, why move to bonds at all close to retirement?

Huge thanks in advance :)
 
Your thinking in your first paragraph is correct, ie insurers tend to hold bonds to back annuities, and we can protect ourselves against an increase in annuity prices by holding these bonds.

The reading says:
"If yields on these assets fall, the cost of purchasing annuities will rise", ie if the yield on bonds falls then annuities are more expensive to buy (than they were before the yield fell), since a larger single premium is needed to provide the same stream of pension payments if the insurer cannot achieve such a good level of return on its investments.

"However, this should be offset by a rise in the value of the retirement pension fund." If we invest our pension fund in the same bonds then if whilst we are holding the bonds there is such a fall in yield it will mean that the price of the bonds increases (given the inverse relationship between yield and price on a bond) and so we have a larger retirement fund. And this is what is needed to pay the higher premium to purchase the annuity, ie we are protected against the price rise.

I hope that helps
 
Back
Top