• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Analysis of Surplus: Decrements

S

scarlets

Member
Does anyone know of any established UK Life Insurance company who has Unit Linked Pensions, who with regards to decrements :-

(a) does not adequately collect data with regards to whether these policyholders died or withdrew

(b) has an actuarial department which produces an analysis of surplus without separating deaths and withdrawals but lumps them together as 'decrements'

I'm not asking for names but I cannot think of any UK Life Insurance company with an actuarial department that behaves in this manner.
 
Does anyone know of any established UK Life Insurance company who has Unit Linked Pensions, who with regards to decrements :-

(a) does not adequately collect data with regards to whether these policyholders died or withdrew

(b) has an actuarial department which produces an analysis of surplus without separating deaths and withdrawals but lumps them together as 'decrements'

This is the situation described in Question 1 part (ii) of the April 2012 exam.

It may be surprising that a company lacks the breakdown of data in this way (especially if you work in a large company with a modern valuation system). However, it's quite likely that smaller companies with legacy systems do lack this data (the insurer will have recorded it somewhere, but the actuarial systems may not have access to it).

For example, when I worked in the Valuation department we were using a data system that had a limited number of fields. It had been designed to have enough fields for the business we had been selling. However, as products and data needs changed, we found that we couldn't record everything we'd ideally want to and had to decide what was the most important.

The solution sets out good reasons why the lack of this data is not really a big issue (eg deaths are relatively few and the benefits are likely to be similar to withdrawal benefits anyway). So it may not be worth the effort of investing in new systems to derive this extra information.

Best wishes

Mark
 
As there are separate admin processes for processing deaths or withdrawals then companies big and small would have this basic data recorded. Even the most basic legacy systems I've seen would have this information.

And I'm yet to see any analysis of surplus report produced by actuaries that doesn't separate deaths and withdrawals.

Bogus exam question detached from reality. Very unfair.
 
Shouldn't Acted do the right thing and tell the Examiners the question was very unfair? As it appears that people who have stuck by commercial reality have not gained credit for pointing out how bogus the scenario described is for long-established UK insurance companies. Seems only those who played along with the unreal situation posed have gained credit. That doesn't make it look good who they let qualify.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The constant whining isn't likely to get you anywhere .

There will be many unusual situations that we all will face throughout our careers and what the profession is keen on is for actuaries to be able to think intelligently about the most practical way to proceed.
 
I'm concerned about what's right, fair, legitimate & intellectually consistent. I don't sell those things out for personal advantage. Clearly some do.
 
The constant whining isn't likely to get you anywhere .

There will be many unusual situations that we all will face throughout our careers and what the profession is keen on is for actuaries to be able to think intelligently about the most practical way to proceed.

Which in this case would be... get the data. Not make up a load of waffle. Seems only the latter has gained credit in this exam. Shameful.
 
Back
Top