Apologies if you thought I was mocking your exam progress - the intention of the message was to try and point out the extent you expect the IFOA to go to for transition arrangements is completely unreasonable and unpractical. And I'll be the first to admit my posts have been getting more and more antagonising to you/ almost_there but in my opinion your are spamming and ruining a perfectly good forum that can be a great benefit to a great many people. And as I said in another thread - its not what your posting that I have an issue with, I'd be happy for you to have a thread on it and argue your point til the cows come home - its the sheer number of threads that are being taken over by it, swamping topics that are of interest or of help to other people.
I notice there was no comeback on the point about the hazard perception test, or a lot of the other valid arguments people are making against you. At some point, you will have to take a reality check.
Apology accepted from you. Some offensive post from a random person on here is no big deal. But making me do extra exams for nothing is.
The reason why I have posted on so many threads is
A) someone has asked a question specifically relating to this change in the exam system. As you have seen I’m not the only person to complain. I had to explain to an Acted tutor on here that CT8 is indeed 2 exams.
B) Acted Admin keep shutting down the thread
C) I have yet to see a convincing argument based on something other than opinion
So please don’t blame me. There are also only a couple of people who stand firmly with the IFoA on these issues. Some of the profiles are dubious.
I note that no one says anything about many of my points as there is no answer. The IFoA have either cocked up or are intentionally lying to students.
There was no point to double CT3 and CT8 and there is no point to join ct1 and CT5 and CT4 and CT6. Especially not when your ceo has promised current students will be disadvantaged and in an exam system which takes many people more than a decade to complete. Why is a one to one mapping not feasible? Why do the exams need to be joined together retrospectively? If a few students were disadvantaged ok. But it is 10,000. And on top of that they have lied
The only reason why people didn’t kick off in the consultation and infact they did was that the IFoA quelled student and other stakeholders fears by promising no increase in exams.
You can see how caniving they are in the council minutes. They know the chartered actuary proposal is not popular but they say they will just repackage it and they again in a few years if the proposal fails.
If you look on reddit, one person(which is not me) has summed it up nicely.
“Why can’t these cxxts leave things alone for one year”.
Not my words to be clear
I have taken a reality check. I’m not going to be bullied by you or the profession. I am taking action and this seems to be the only place where (when my posts are not edited without my knowledge or deleted) that there is some platform for me to express my view.
I’ve been blocked on Facebook and Twitter and the IFoA and actuary magazine don’t want to listen either.
What is your point about hazard perception? Perhaps I have overlooked it? I’m happy to answer any questions you may have