• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Acquisition

  • Thread starter SpringbokSupporter
  • Start date
S

SpringbokSupporter

Member
If company A were to buy company B for cash the impact on company A's balance sheet would be a reduction in its value (because assets will reduce). However if company A were to acquire all the shares of company B then these could be accounted for as an asset in company A's balance sheet and can offset the cost of purchasing it.

Therefore, am I correct in saying that an acquisition should always be made for shares rather than cash?
 
Irrespective of cash or shares, it is an acquisition.

Hence company B's Assets - Liabilities = assets to company A.
 
But if you buy with cash, you may lower your level of assets admissible for supervisory solvency purposes, whereas if you pay the target company with shares, you don't do risk this drop in statutory free assets (as far as I can see?)
 
couple of thoughts...

1. I don't think we're considering only insurance companies here - if Company A is a car manufacturer and Company B is a tire maker 'admissable assets' and 'statutory solvency purposes' will be alien concepts. Important to consider all possibilities if the question is not specific.

2. Acquisitions can be structured in a number of ways - a the main ones are:

a) Company A pays cash to Company B's shareholders in return for Company B's shares (called a 'share deal'), and Company A acquires control of a % of Company B's business (could be 100%)

b) Company A pays cash to Company B to acquire a specific part of Company B's business ('asset deal') - Company B may be selling off a part of the business that isn't making money or doesn't fit well with the rest of its business. Think about a bank selling off it's life assurance book.

In both cases the bank balance reduces (assets down) but this is offset against increase in assets as Company A now own a) shares which will have a market value, or b) a bunch of assets less related liabilities.

3. In practice few companies have the level of cash in their bank accounts to perform this kind of transaction, and have to raise capital through issuing debt or equity to do it:

- issuing its own shares / bonds to current owner of Company B
- issuing shares through a rights offer to raise capital for the acquisition
- issue debt to the market / banks to raise the necessary capital.

4. The real balance sheet impact is the combination of:

a) The value of the acquisition over the price Company A paid for it, and

b) Impact of new capital raised to effect the acquisition

Hope this helps clear things up and good luck for the exam! :eek:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top