I have to agree that I found the paper quite challenging and very disappointing. Given the wide range of topics on the course I was disappointed how abstract certain questions were. More than a few people in my centre echoed the sentiment that it would have been possible to make a fair attempt at the paper without having reviewed the course notes.
I thought Question seven on Basel I was a bit unfair - the formula for the Tier I ratio isn't defined explicitly within the Acted notes and from my reading of the notes I had placed more emphasis on understanding Basel II and Basel III.
Question 8 wouldn't have looked out of place on a CA1 paper and given the large question on VaR on the Autumn 2011 paper I was surprised to see it appearing again.
Given all the tricky maths on the course I felt like I had wasted my time spending a good chunk of time trying to understand the mathsy parts of the course particularly chapters 10-16.
Overall I thought the actual questions were very open ended and ultimately difficult to pick marks up on. I reckon I could be back for seconds in September unfortunately !
Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2012