• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

holding times

F

floydeon

Member
Please can someone explain the mathematical definition given for the residual holding time in the CR. {R_s>w,X_s=i}={X_u=i,s<u<s+w}. I understand the concept but the definition given seems a bit confusing.

Also would i be correct in saying that the current holding time plus the residual holding time has an exponential distribution in a time-homogeneous Markov jump process since it is simply the total holding time?
 
Cool

Please can someone explain the mathematical definition given for the residual holding time in the CR. {R_s>w,X_s=i}={X_u=i,s<u<s+w}. I understand the concept but the definition given seems a bit confusing.
QUOTE]

Hi Floydeon,

I can answer the 1st part of the question only. What it means is that:
the event consisting of the X_s = i and R_s > w is equivalent to the event of consisting of X_u = i for all u in (s,s+w) (strictly speaking speaking I think X_u = i for all u in [s,s+w] but let's not get into that). I think it makes sense if you just think of it as following: To be in state i at time s, and to be in that state for a period time greater than w, I have to be in state i for the entire period [s,s+w].

I hope you understand the 1st part better now.

Goku
 
thanks goku..you must be a super saiyan when it comes to CT4. that does make sense although i would be happier if the definition was {R_s=w,X_s=i}={X_u=i,s<u<s+w}, but sure its not worth getting upset about.
 
Gee thanks Floydeon, however I very much doubt I'll ever reach that level! Anyway, as regards your preference "{R_s=w,X_s=i}={X_u=i,s<u<s+w}", from my understanding of statistics and probability, that event occurs with probability zero. Well, it's because R_s has a continuous state space and therefore has a corresponding probability density function associated to it. Kinda like how f(x) is a density for a Normal distribution. So if indeed we wanted to find P[X = a] in this case, we would have to integrate the pdf from a to a, which is just zero.

However a discrete distribution is associated with a probability mass function and is characterized by a 'jumping' non-continuous distribution. An example of that is N(t) where N(t) is Poi(lambda*t). Hence it is permissible to write and speak of P[N(t) = a].

So to conclude, to have X_u = i, s<u<s+w, we require the event {R_s > w,X_s=i} to occur.

Hope that answers you query.

Ka-me-ha-me-ha!
 
Back
Top