G
Gbob1
Member
At the moment I'm trying to figure out which university I'd rather go to (although I will be applying to both). I'm just concerned that the fees for CASS is 16,000 for the year whereas Kent is around 5000 - obviously a big difference. I am just wondering: does this necessarily reflect the quality of teaching, or more just the location of the universities (with London generally being much more expensive).
I know that a lot of people on here have warned me against doing a Master's program because apparently employers don't like to see too many exemptions. However, I'm almost finishing an undergraduate in Music and, so far, this hasn't helped in getting me an internship - so how can doing a postgrad in actuarial science harm my chances right?
If you're wondering why only these two universities - they're the only two that enable someone without a numerical degree (although, with high mathematical competency) to get into the Master's program.
I know that a lot of people on here have warned me against doing a Master's program because apparently employers don't like to see too many exemptions. However, I'm almost finishing an undergraduate in Music and, so far, this hasn't helped in getting me an internship - so how can doing a postgrad in actuarial science harm my chances right?
If you're wondering why only these two universities - they're the only two that enable someone without a numerical degree (although, with high mathematical competency) to get into the Master's program.