For Reference: Page 5 (Chapter 7)
Case: A policyholder (who falls under the Marginal tax rate band of 40%) purchased lifetime - deferred annuity (with 10 years deferred period).
Annual premium paid by policyholder for 10 years is 1,000.
The annual investment income earned on Premium paid net of taxes is 5000, accumulated every year, is taxed on the concept of I-E at basic rate, during the accumulation phase.
After 10 years, suppose this the annuity fund value stands at 15,000.
Ques1: Is this 15,000 (Fund value) net of tax?
Ques2: Is this 15,000 considered as Purchase price of annuity?
Assuming the above two questions are true –
Annual Annuity an vesting date is computed to be 2000 p.a.
Expected Lifetime of policyholder – 10years
Policyholder component = 15000/10 = 1500
Tax would be paid on 2000 – 1500 at Marginal rate (40%)
Ques 3: Isn’t the government charging less tax during accumulation phase(basic rate, 20%) when policyholder is liable to pay marginal rate (40%, which is higher than basic rate)?
Ques 4: if Ques 1 statement is false, won’t the situation fall under double taxation case?
- Premiums are taxable
- Investment earnings are taxed on I-E basis at Basic Rate (say 20%)
- Benefits: Excess of Annuity over policyholder premium component (purchase price of annuity/Expected lifetime of policyholder) is taxed at Marginal Tax Rate (say 40%)
Case: A policyholder (who falls under the Marginal tax rate band of 40%) purchased lifetime - deferred annuity (with 10 years deferred period).
Annual premium paid by policyholder for 10 years is 1,000.
The annual investment income earned on Premium paid net of taxes is 5000, accumulated every year, is taxed on the concept of I-E at basic rate, during the accumulation phase.
After 10 years, suppose this the annuity fund value stands at 15,000.
Ques1: Is this 15,000 (Fund value) net of tax?
Ques2: Is this 15,000 considered as Purchase price of annuity?
Assuming the above two questions are true –
Annual Annuity an vesting date is computed to be 2000 p.a.
Expected Lifetime of policyholder – 10years
Policyholder component = 15000/10 = 1500
Tax would be paid on 2000 – 1500 at Marginal rate (40%)
Ques 3: Isn’t the government charging less tax during accumulation phase(basic rate, 20%) when policyholder is liable to pay marginal rate (40%, which is higher than basic rate)?
Ques 4: if Ques 1 statement is false, won’t the situation fall under double taxation case?