• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Past Paper Questions

A

Anne Marie

Member
Hi

I'm looking at some past questions (Oct 2015 Q1)

Its split into various parts. In my answer, the points I made were in different sections to the examiners report (e.g my j curve point was earlier).

would I still get credit for this?
 
Hard to be certain. Strictly speaking, no because the report would give the points they were expecting in what they believe are the relevant sections. That said, there is scope for discretion and some examiners may allow this and any issues like this would probably get discussed at the examiners meting. Also, if you are borderline and the script is subject to extra scrutiny, that may help your case. No experience on Sa6 so my comments are generic. Perhaps think why did I put this in X rather than y? I think you are probably right not to duplicate material in different sections albeit there can be overlap if one section goes into more detail than another and you need to bring that into your answer.
 
As mentioned above, there is some discretion, and examiners can award you a point in a second section if you have mentioned it in the first section. Any sections "a, b, c" are marked together so it doesnt matter which of these you enter the idea - they all count together. Parts (i), (ii), (iii) etc are different, but often examiners try to be lenient. Duplication is time consuming, but if it seems to fit both, there is not much downside to mentioning it twice.
 
Back
Top