K
Kelly_
Member
I am confused about how increasing the RDR would make up for a variance of return on capital. In the solution to Q&A Bank 3.8, it says that you can calculate the impact of the return on capital by varying the assumptions and then from that will indicate how much the RDR needs to be increased in order to compensate for the potential shortfalls.
My question is that, if you are varying your assumptions and that will give a range of possible profits, why are you increasing the RDR to make up the shortfall? I would have thought for a reduced level of profit, if you increased the discount rate it would just reduce the profits further?
Also for these scenarios, I assume that the denominator of the capital required will also vary if you are in a 'bad' scenario? As you need more reserves to make up for the shortfall? Or is the capital required just the initial reserve at the start and doesn't consider that you might need more capital further into the policy?
My question is that, if you are varying your assumptions and that will give a range of possible profits, why are you increasing the RDR to make up the shortfall? I would have thought for a reduced level of profit, if you increased the discount rate it would just reduce the profits further?
Also for these scenarios, I assume that the denominator of the capital required will also vary if you are in a 'bad' scenario? As you need more reserves to make up for the shortfall? Or is the capital required just the initial reserve at the start and doesn't consider that you might need more capital further into the policy?