• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Cost of Guarantee "Bite"

A

Aman

Member
Hi

Scenario: A company sold an endowment product, with a feature that policyholder will be offered guaranteed annuity rate at retirement when the policy matures.

Now please assume that there is low-interest rate environment at retirement age and the guaranteed annuity rate is attractive for those who want to buy an annuity.

When it comes to cost of guarantee, which statement would be valid:
1. because market rates are lower than guaranteed rate, the guarantee is biting when the option is exercised.
2. if more policyholders are taking up guaranteed annuity rates than the expected policyholders, the guarantee is biting
or both

I am of the view that company deducts the charges to cover the expected cost of guarantees. So the actual "bite" to the insurer is when actual guarantees are higher than expected guarantees.

Let me know what you think

Thanks
 
Aman said:
Hi

Scenario: A company sold an endowment product, with a feature that policyholder will be offered guaranteed annuity rate at retirement when the policy matures.

Now please assume that there is low-interest rate environment at retirement age and the guaranteed annuity rate is attractive for those who want to buy an annuity.

When it comes to cost of guarantee, which statement would be valid:
1. because market rates are lower than guaranteed rate, the guarantee is biting when the option is exercised.
2. if more policyholders are taking up guaranteed annuity rates than the expected policyholders, the guarantee is biting
or both

I am of the view that company deducts the charges to cover the expected cost of guarantees. So the actual "bite" to the insurer is when actual guarantees are higher than expected guarantees.

Let me know what you think

Thanks
Click to expand...
Hi

Only statement one is true. Biting only occurs when the guaranteed rate is greater than the market rate, and if the guarantee doesn't bite then there is zero cost to the company. The charge is calculated by working out the average time the guarantee bites and by how much.

Hope this helps
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top