• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Collective Defined Contributions

I

Irwin

Member
Good day,
Does anybody have information on how collective defined contributions work?
Why was this type of scheme formulated in the UK?
How would you formulate an investment strategy if the liabilities keep on being recalculated to adjust to the valuation of assets?
Does liability driven investment fall away?

Kind regards,
Irwin
 
Hi Irwin

Collective DC schemes (CDC schemes) are a form of risk-sharing arrangement. In the UK, legislation has only recently come into force to enable them, so UK experience is very limited. However Royal Mail is introducing a CDC scheme. I suspect that, in practice, different schemes will operate differently, but broadly speaking: Like a normal DC scheme, the employer pays a fixed rate of contributions. However members' funds are pooled together to share the risk. Benefits paid on retirement are dependent on the funding level of the scheme and may be subject to variation once in payment.

CDC schemes are more well established in some other countries such as the Netherlands and Denmark. I think one reason they are being introduced in the UK is that modelling has suggested that generally CDC schemes may give members better outcomes than standard DC schemes.

I haven't seen any analysis of how to formulate an investment strategy for a CDC scheme but it seems to me that it would be possible to use a similar approach to that used for a final salary scheme. For example, in the CDC scheme there may be some benefits that are "guaranteed" or at least you really don't want to cut back. The scheme managers need to decide to what extent they wish to invest in assets that match these guaranteed benefits, and to what extent they are prepared to mismatch assets and liabilities in pursuit of higher returns. Higher returns may lead to discretionary benefits being granted.

Even in a final salary scheme there is uncertainty over the level of the guaranteed benefits, eg active members' benefits will be dependent on future salary increases, which are uncertain. So, I don't think uncertainty over the CDC liabilities is a huge issue. As you say, the liabilities can be recalibrated towards the level of the assets. Perhaps this option will allow CDC schemes to take a bit more investment risk in pursuit of higher returns and higher benefits?

I think there are some good articles online about CDC schemes

Hope that helps

Gresham
 
Last edited:
Back
Top