• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Chapter 6: Section 1.6

J

jensen

Member
Hi

After question 6.8, the notes mentioned that the trigger event can be the modelled loss from a cat model after the model parameters have been updated to reflect the event.

Why is this so?

Thanks.
 
For the benefit of other students reading this, I think you are referring to Section 1.6 of Chapter 7.

Modelled loss triggers may be preferred by investors because surprises are less likely to occur in the modelled losses than the actual losses. Investors may also be wary of actual loss triggers because the actual losses can be influenced by underwriting and claims handling decisions of the insurer sponsoring the bond.

I hope this helps
Duncan
 
Thanks Duncan

Oops! Typo there :D

What exactly do they mean by 'model parameters'? If it is an earthquake, is it referring to the magnitude/epicenter/depth? There are usually a couple of sources for these information following an event, so how do they select the parameters best represent the event?
 
Yes, the types of item you suggest (magnitude etc) are the “model parameters”. A modelling agent would be assigned for the bond (eg AIR) at the outset and then the parameter values used for the event would be the ones collected by that modelling agent.

Hope this helps
Duncan
 
Last edited:
Back
Top