• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Chapter 20 Q20.3 (i)

S

sma09gc

Member
Hi,

For Ch20 (i) I don’t quite understand how the recoveries/net numbers are being calculated. Looking at the solution I have 2 questions:

- why do we reduce for the 20% quota share twice? Why doesn’t the XoL just act on the GCI net of QS number?

- how is the XoL part calculated? I’m the example for Year 5 NCI, I don’t understand where the 850 comes from in the formula: 80% x 98667 - (80% x 850 - 500) = 78754.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
 
Hi sa09gc,

We're given a risk XL, which means it operates on individual losses. Hence we can't just feed the "claims incurred net of QS" through the XL (because that would consist of lots of claims all in one pot).

Instead, the question:
  • first calculates the claims incurred net of QS (which in Year 5 is 80%*98,667=78,934)
  • and then deducts the recoveries from the large losses given in the second table (in Year 5 there is only one loss to hit the XL layer, and it's shown in the last row of the second table, 850)...
    • So first net down this single loss for the QS: 850*80%=680
    • then feed it through the XL: 680-500=180.
  • Hence, the NCI is 78934-180=78,754
Of course, this assumes that the large losses are NOT included in the underwriting statistics shown in the first table, which is why you were confused.

Best wishes,

Katherine.
 
Back
Top