• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Ch13 3.3 Non-linearity

A

almost_there

Member
It states that due to non-linearity, a higher SCR could be produced for the 99.5% than that calculated by the correlation matrix.
Therefore doesn't this suggest the correlation matrix is insufficient since it also says an allowance has to be made for this, how? What kind of adjustment?

Does this non-linearity have any connection with least solvent likely event (LSLE) ? Does the difference between correlation matrix SCR and LSLE explain the allowance?

Final question on this- don't the SCR for each risk get calculated by a stochastic process anyway, so wouldn't that take care of the non-linearity?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top